End of Racialisms-Satan Advocacy
A proposition that the intent of our presence is more than the human history narrative. It is the Time using those incidentals to have a convocation of the cultures much like the Sufi parable, 'The Convocation of the Birds'. Unlike or corollary to the parable this is the
Yet in the particulars we see the hybridization of varieties. The random catch-as-it-happens, than a formally or informally obligated arranged end of ethnic segregation of incestuousness choices. With the gene mixture is the mixture of attitudes of behavior. That mixture is an incidental expedience for the accommodation of necessary, as well as locale-obliged transactions, which leads to the coincidental social consequences. The overwhelming results not being known are because of the focus on the anecdotal shit-head acts that are the unions of support convenience.
There are those who MAY be in the love-of-lust, most have come to the point of the convenience of the partnership. It's not as bad as it sounds for those who exist for the romance standards. They are together for the practical symbiotic support that's exchanged, despite whatever eye-rolling idiosyncrasies of form or style they have reached. That ethos is indirectly comprehended by their offspring. That kind of comprehension isn't one of a singular, You-are-or-aren't focus It's an acceptance of tolerable feasibility.
This 'tolerable feasibility' has degenerative effects on rectitude or precise congruence to former standards-an anathema for traditionalist. That state of dynamism has an inherent flexibility of literal and figurative tolerance that a broader series of signals are added to the vernacular of the meaningful . [I'd be the one of the firsts to point out that degradation and undermining of former standards of identification to the point of their nullification]. The broadening of the vernacular signals of identification though diluting and minimizing the importance of the former honored and revered ethos is more functional with the present inter-cultural social dynamics. That state of dynamics may not be to the standards or going in the direction of its more racially chauvinistic critics, but the direction it's going is more adaptive to the tools of use of the age.
Those adaptive ends provide a better functional or better aesthetically functional culture? If tangible range of mechanics isn't as important as the depth of aesthetic identity then whatever lesser, immediate tangible gains that are forsaken should be seen as the necessary sacrifice. Any resentment for making such a lesser gain acceptance is a paradoxical inconsistency equal to 'wanting the cake and eating it, too!'.
On the contrasting side, should the incidental necessary ignorance that allows for the accessing a wider tangible resources and assets be akin to 'gaining the world and losing one's soul'. Or is it what quality of empathy one should have? Is it to artifices or should it be to the physical needs. There'd seem to be a marginal-to-ambiguous area where artifices become a repression, just as physical needs become an excessive indulgence. Which one best addresses the needed forms for the future, as well as the present would take a quite insightful seer to so discern and articulate.. 'Which bests serves the long-term needs from the point of view of the individual than from a third party', especially the collective viewpoint, would be for me the determinative liberational option.
